For fans of Friday the 13th: The Game (affiliate link), the story surrounding the game has always been almost as complicated as the horror franchise itself.
What began as an ambitious attempt to bring Jason Voorhees into the world of multiplayer gaming eventually became one of the better-known asymmetrical horror games of its era. But years of legal battles, licensing problems and disagreements over the franchise ultimately brought the game to an end.
Now, the Friday the 13th saga has entered another chapter.
Gun Interactive, the company behind Friday the 13th: The Game, has publicly responded to a lawsuit brought by Horror, Inc., and the company is making it clear that it intends to fight the case.
A dispute over millions of dollars
According to Gun Interactive's August 28 statement, the central issue in the new lawsuit is royalties from Friday the 13th: The Game.
Gun says that it paid Horror, Inc. more than $18 million in royalties over the lifetime of the game and maintains that it paid everything it was contractually required to pay. The company also claims that Horror, Inc.'s representatives previously reviewed and approved the financial reports associated with those payments.
Gun says Horror, Inc. is now seeking approximately another $4 million, based on accounting methods that Gun disputes. Other reports have described the lawsuit as seeking as much as roughly $4.5 million and have reported additional allegations concerning financial records. Those allegations remain matters for the legal process to resolve.
In other words, this isn't simply a disagreement about the game's popularity or how it was managed. At the heart of the case is a financial dispute over how revenue from the game was calculated and what Horror, Inc. believes it was entitled to receive.
And that's only the latest legal problem surrounding Friday the 13th.
Friday the 13th: The Game's copyright problems
To understand why this situation is particularly frustrating for fans, it's necessary to go back several years.
Gun Interactive licensed the rights needed to make Friday the 13th: The Game in 2015. The project eventually became a multiplayer survival-horror experience in which one player controlled Jason while other players attempted to survive.
The concept was simple but effective: take one of the most recognizable slasher villains ever created and turn the movie's basic premise into a multiplayer game.
The result developed a dedicated community.
But behind the scenes, the Friday the 13th franchise was becoming entangled in a legal fight over who controlled parts of its intellectual property.
Victor Miller, the screenwriter of the original Friday the 13th, pursued termination of his U.S. copyright interests. Horror, Inc. challenged Miller's position in court.
Gun's latest statement points to that dispute as a major reason the game's post-launch development eventually became restricted.
According to Gun, the uncertainty surrounding the rights prevented the team from continuing with the new content players wanted. Horror, Inc. ultimately lost the initial case in 2018 and its appeal in 2021, according to Gun's account.
The important distinction here is that the copyright dispute and the current royalty lawsuit are separate legal matters. The new case concerns the business relationship surrounding the game rather than simply repeating the earlier copyright battle.
A game that never got the future fans wanted
This is arguably the most disappointing part of the entire story.
Friday the 13th: The Game had the ingredients for a long life.
It had a recognizable horror license, an unusual multiplayer concept and a community that clearly wanted more. The game could have continued receiving new maps, characters, Jason variations and other content for years.
Instead, the legal situation effectively put the brakes on that future.
Gun says that even after the earlier copyright dispute, it was interested in working with Horror, Inc. on a remastered version of the game and potentially giving it another life.
That never happened.
According to Gun, the license eventually expired, which brought the game's commercial life to an end. The game was removed from digital storefronts and its servers were eventually shut down. Gun also says it offered to continue paying to keep the servers running.
For players, the result was brutally simple: a game they had spent years playing was no longer something they could simply buy and play as before.
The bitter irony for the community
This is what makes the current lawsuit especially frustrating for many fans.
From a player's perspective, the game didn't die because people suddenly stopped caring about Jason Voorhees.
It died because the business and legal situation surrounding the franchise made continuing the game increasingly difficult.
Gun's position is essentially that it invested heavily in developing and supporting the game, paid substantial royalties, built a community around it and attempted to find a way to continue the project.
The company now argues that it shouldn't have to pay additional money years later based on accounting interpretations it disputes.
Horror, Inc., of course, has a different position, which is why the dispute is now in court.
Until the legal proceedings establish what actually happened, neither side's accusations should be treated as a final verdict.
Why this matters beyond Friday the 13th
The situation illustrates a bigger problem with licensed video games.
When a developer creates an original game, it generally controls the underlying intellectual property. A licensed game is different.
The developer can spend years building the technology, gameplay systems, community and reputation around a property it does not ultimately own.
If the license expires or the rights holders become involved in a legal dispute, the developer can suddenly find itself unable to continue supporting a game that players still want.
Friday the 13th: The Game is an especially painful example because its identity was inseparable from the franchise.
Gun couldn't simply remove Jason Voorhees and replace him with an original killer. That would fundamentally change the game.
The same licensing relationship that made the game special also created one of its biggest vulnerabilities.
Gun Interactive is still working with horror
Interestingly, this isn't the end of Gun Interactive's involvement in licensed horror.
The company has continued working in the genre, most notably with The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, and has also been involved with IllFonic's Halloween (affiliate link). Gun's own description of its creative philosophy emphasizes authenticity, immersion, innovation and community — qualities that have become closely associated with its approach to licensed horror projects.
The Halloween project is particularly interesting because it shows that Gun hasn't abandoned major horror properties despite the difficult history surrounding Friday the 13th.
In fact, Halloween launched in September 2026 with both single-player and multiplayer elements, giving horror fans another major licensed property to experience in game form.
That makes the current Friday the 13th dispute feel less like the end of Gun's relationship with horror and more like another chapter in a complicated history.
What happens next?
For now, the most important thing is that the case still needs to play out.
Gun Interactive has made its position very clear: it denies that it owes the additional money being claimed and says it intends to defend itself rather than settle simply because litigation is expensive.
Horror, Inc.'s claims will have to be tested through the legal process.
For fans, however, there is a much bigger question lurking behind the lawsuit.
Could Friday the 13th: The Game ever come back?
That's impossible to answer with confidence right now.
A return would require the rights holders and the game's potential developers or publishers to reach an agreement that allows the project to move forward. The current dispute certainly doesn't make that prospect any easier.
And perhaps that's the most frustrating part for the people who loved the game.
Friday the 13th: The Game proved that there was an audience for a faithful, multiplayer Jason Voorhees experience. Players showed up. The community formed. The concept worked.
But the game became trapped in circumstances that had very little to do with whether players actually wanted to keep playing it.
The latest lawsuit is therefore more than another piece of legal news for an old video game. It's a reminder of how fragile licensed games can be — and how easily years of development, community building and player loyalty can become collateral damage when the business relationships behind a franchise fall apart.
For now, Jason remains one of horror's most recognizable icons.
But his most famous multiplayer video game remains stuck in a legal nightmare of its own.
Friday the 13th: The Game Remaster?
According to Gun's statement, they wanted to do a remaster of F13 and keep the servers up and running:
Gun Interactive Statement on Horror, Inc.
